Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazuo Nakano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 19:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kazuo Nakano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this vice editor-in-chief under WP:GNG. Additional sources welcome. Language issues in play, the one source on the article in jp.wiki is primary but would, I would imagine, verify the basic claim of vice-editorship. joe decker ^{talk to me} 23:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:16, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:16, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unreferenced BLP, bye bye. Vice editors of weekly manga anthologies are probably not notable. No sources could be easily found. —SW— ^gab 23:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Being vice-editor is hardly a notable position, and no in-depth coverage or sourcing has been forthcoming. --DAJF (talk) 11:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.