Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazennye
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Carbonite | Talk 12:23, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Del a foreign dicdef, false and misleading too. This Russian word has adequate translations into English. mikka (t) 06:19, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keepDelete http://www.google.com/search?q=Kazennye&hl=en&lr=lang_en&c2coff=1&as_qdr=all&start=30&sa=N gives 39 references, approx 20 real English (not transliterated Russian). It looks like some historians thinks it is an English term abakharev 06:27, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]- So what? The term in all cases has a perfectly adequate translation, and it is quite normal in academic texts to accompany some terms with rendering in native language. mikka (t) 06:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, You both have made me change my mind. abakharev 10:35, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- So what? The term in all cases has a perfectly adequate translation, and it is quite normal in academic texts to accompany some terms with rendering in native language. mikka (t) 06:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original creation comment says definition of 'kazennye' according to James Cracraft. That suggests it's not going to become an article. Dlyons493 Talk 06:40, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. KNewman 08:01, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I would much rather prefer to see this article
expandedre-written and moved to a better title (Government-owned lands in Imperial Russia, maybe?), but since it is unlikely that it is going to happen, and since the article in its present form is unacceptable, delete it is.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 12:40, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply] - Delete per referrer. --Ghirlandajo 14:25, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above.--Gaff 07:04, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.