Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kay Wilson Stallings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Noting also that the nomination was withdrawn. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kay Wilson Stallings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. What is there is a press release and a profile and a passing mention. No secondary coverage. scope_creep^Talk 22:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The "no coverage" comment is simply not true, Hollywood Reporter article has an author and enough independent content to count towards WP:GNG in my opinion. The Royal Gazette article again appears to be independent. NemesisAT (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One is a routine annoucement of end of search and new boss, as its Sesame Street, its famous and it rubs off, the other is mentioned in passing. If she wasn't there, there would be no change to the article. Both of these reference are primary. There is no secondary sources on this BLP. And there is no coverage anywhere after doing a CSE, before search. scope_creep^Talk 11:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I'm not familiar with the abbreviation CSE. However I did another search and found this, and plenty of articles quoting the subject. NemesisAT (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Google CSE search, another search format. That is another interview with same image, indicating it is a PR effort. scope_creep^Talk 12:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She meets the first notability point on WP:ANYBIO: "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times." She has won and been nominated for multiple Daytime Emmy Awards with a recent win in 2020. As for the other sources, the Hollywood Reporter article is an "Exclusive" written by an author (not just a copy of a press release), and the Royal Gazette article is original and goes into some detail about her work too. Squittens (talk) 14:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as she won a daytime emmyJackattack1597 (talk) 19:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That is solid keep for sure. Solid Nomination Withdrawn scope_creep^Talk 20:06, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.