Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katya Cengel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Katya Cengel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Katya Cengel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No clear pass of WP:GNG. Sources do note denote any notability or significance. Primary sources all around. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 16:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:NAUTHOR. Multiple books with multiple reviews. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 17:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • From Chernobyl with Love: [1], [2]
  • Exiled: [3], [4], [5]
  • Bluegrass Baseball: [6]
• Keep per AleatoryPonderings and WP:NAUTHOR. pburka (talk) 17:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
• Keep WP:NAUTHOR is a higher bar than simply having a few reviews of your works published. To say someone's work has "won significant critical attention" I would like to see substantially more in the way of coverage for her works. That said, the author does in fact pass WP:GNG. She has been interviewed multiple times by KCBX and has received coverage in local publications [7]. Other interviews and sources by reliable publications include: [8] [9] [10] W42 20:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
• Keep Easily meets criteria 3 of WP:NAUTHOR as proven by AleatoryPonderings. As demonstrated by W42 and my GoogleNews search, there is also sufficient coverage of Cengel to meet WP:GNG. Samsmachado (talk) 23:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.