Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Gold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. Arkyan  ^(talk) 21:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Gold[edit]

~~non notable, no real sources, fails WP:PORNBIO. Natalie 04:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)~~ [reply]

- User:Epbr123 has noted that Gold has won an AVN award and added it to the article, which satisfies WP:PORNBIO. I withdraw this AfD. Natalie 23:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:PORNBIO. Flyguy649^talk_contribs 04:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. Tabercil 19:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She won Best Supporting Actress - Video at the 1999 AVN Awards. Epbr123 20:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Edison 23:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How does she fail WP:PORNBIO? She won Best Supporting Actress - Video at the 1999 AVN Awards. Epbr123 08:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She has not only won an AVN Award but an XRCO Award as well. She has been a long time performer and has made 250+ movies. I think that is enough to warrant an article. MikeH411
Keep per MikeH411. Two separate industry awards shows notability - see criteria one for WP:PORNBIO ("Performer has won or been a serious contender for a well-known award"). Tabercil 22:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep even by porn standards Katie Gold has worked in a lot of films. accusing her of being NN shows a lack of knowledge in the field, no offence DelPlaya 22:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Actually, if you read WP:PORNBIO, you will see that the number of films any one person has been in is explicitly noted as not a measure of notability. However, awards are, so I withdrawing this nomination. Thank you Epbr123 for finding the cite. Natalie 23:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the AVN Award, a very clear PORNBIO criterion. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 08:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.