Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Anne Feeney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that while the event may be notable, a person is not automatically conferred notability by winning the event. Mkativerata (talk) 23:28, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kathryn Anne Feeney[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is winning the Rose of Tralee sufficient to satisfy WP:N? I don't think so and if so, this person is just not notable enough for an article. Mattinbgn (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 22:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a major award, no notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - important enough for international contestants and has been a media event since 1959. Much longer than the The Oprah Winfrey Show, for example.Red Hurley (talk) 11:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO 1 gnews hit does not cut it. LibStar (talk) 02:56, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Rose of Tralee contest is notable but its winners are not automatically notable unless they go on the do other things as some have done. Feeney has not done so she fails notability guidelines. Calen11 (talk) 19:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.