Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Crouch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Crouch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crouch was the winner of a state contest. In general deletion outcomes suggest only winners of national level contests are notable. The sources here are a hyper local paper, her college's paper (which we almost never count for notability of students or faculty) and the website of the contest she won. Nothing close to notability. There is a claim of a discussion on merging, but I see no evidence there was ever an actual discussion John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:28, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment When I went to notify the article creator I realized that I am the article creator. I did not understand Wikipedia notability as well back in 2009 as I do today, and the rules of notability were more lax back then. This feels like going full circle back to my July 2016 nomination of the article on Sloan Bailey for deletion. The one difference is that I personally knew Sloan Bailey and have not to my knowledge ever personally met Crouch, however beyond that detail the situation is relatively the same. It is also a little different since Bailey did not actually complete her time as Miss Nevada USA (and also by some measure Miss America is more notable than Miss USA), but since except rare hyper local coverage all the coverage we get at all on state pageant winners is focused on when they are crowned and not their "reign", I do not think that detail makes the two cases significantly different.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 25. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.