Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Crothall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Crothall

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:INDEPENDENT sources apart from some small mentions? Seems to fail WP:GNG. TLA (talk) 02:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Health and fitness, Science, Engineering, Medicine, California, Pennsylvania, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Run of the mill businessperson. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 10:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being a CEO, founding companies, having patents, and winning what looks like non-notable awards, doesn't grant automatic notability. Don't see how would meet WP:NPROF either. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete subject does not have significant coverage. Only a few citations in Google Scholar, so WP:NACADEMIC is not met. Fails notability. Royal88888 (talk) 08:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.