Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Connors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ⨹ 20:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Connors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor state-level beauty-pageant winner. No other actual accomplishments, only a few local media references and one appearance at a MLB game. Been there, done that Calton | Talk 14:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - She is far from sufficently notable. Mabalu (talk) 15:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a WP:GNG pass. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regan Hartley for some good "keep" arguments in a similar deletion discussion. Ejgreen77 (talk) 23:28, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For passing GNG. This person seems media-savvy enough to have themselves featured in multiple newspapers in multiples cities. I do not think this person would meet Wikipedia's typical inclusion criteria for award winners because as the nominator said, the award is regional and does not get much press coverage. This person has gotten coverage, though. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:30, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as passes GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sources appear to reach WP:BASIC. --j⚛e decker ^talk 17:40, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.