Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Chronis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 08:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Chronis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Although a stub, there are third-party articles about her art. These tend to be small avant-guard publications, but she is after all an avant-guard artist. The most solid reference that the one in Chicago Reader. It would be great if this article could be expanded, but there really isn't much more to say about her, as far as I can see. LaMona (talk) 21:56, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep With my obvious bias as the main author declared. She is mentioned in fringe arts media, which I have supplied , enough to be considered notable. Lumos3 (talk) 23:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 09:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep—Sources cited are adequate to demonstrate notability. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 17:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passes WP:N + WP:GNG –Davey2010 • (talk) 00:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn oer all above. Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 08:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.