Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathar Basha Endra Muthuramalingam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 23:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kathar Basha Endra Muthuramalingam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kathar Basha Endra Muthuramalingam

Article about upcoming film that does not satisfy the notability guidelines for future films. Unreleased films are only notable if the article content establishes that production itself has been notable. Neither the text of this article nor the sources say anything about production except that it happened. The references are all typical advance publicity.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	news18.com	Announcement of release date of film	Yes	No	Yes	No
2	ottplay.com	Announcement of release of film	Yes	No	Yes	No
3	timesofindia.indiatimes.com	Another announcement of film, and short interview with actor	No	No	Yes	No
4	cinemaexpress.com	Another announcement of release date	Yes	No	Yes	No
5	ottplay.com	More advance publicity	Yes	No	Yes	No

This article could be unilaterally draftified, except that there is already a draft, so that the proper disposition is either to delete the article or to merge the article into the draft in draft space. The Heymann criterion is if descriptions of two reviews in reliable sources can be added before the deletion discussion is completed. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Tamil Nadu. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draft and keep. If 2 notable reviews come will move to main page. Monhiroe (talk) 10:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. @Robert McClenon: The film has released and received 4+ reliable reviews. Please close as speedy keep per WP:Heymann. Reviews: [1], [2], [3] and [4]. DareshMohan (talk) 03:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Heymann isn't one of the Speedy Keep options. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as nominator. It appears that the Heymann criterion has been satisfied. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it has enough reviews now to pass. KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.