Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Raworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm ignoring all rules and closing this. The article had sufficient references since its creation. I already left you a note about spurious AfDs on new articles. Natureium (talk)

Kate Raworth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Need more specific authentic reference links SB Shuvo 16:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy keep - not a reason for AfD immediately after creation. Natureium (talk) 19:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - not a deletion claim addressable at AfD. --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.