Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KateModern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, also notability is established. Non admin close. Dusti^{talk to me} 16:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KateModern

A non-notable web series. Jmlk 1 7 04:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Suggest withdrawal of this unresearched nomination. dozens of reliable sources available from a simple google search -- dozens more if you look in google news archives. I know the articles around lonelygirl15 stuff is a mess, and a lot of the actors and stuff probably can be cleaned out, but please at least do a google news search before nominating. --JayHenry (talk) 05:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why wouldn't it be able to be kept. It is on the front page of Bebo, do a to some sort of partnership. It definately shouldn't be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baitt (talk • contribs) 05:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — definite notability MSNBC, The Guardian, The Scotsman, The Wall Street Journal; as well as references to it in stories about AOL's takeover of Bebo — KateModern is mentioned in New York Times, Washington Post etc. I hear there is a forecast for icy precipitation? EJF (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep although much of the article is unsourced, sufficient reliable sources can be found to ensure notability. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 12:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.