Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kastles Stadium at The Wharf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, non admin closure. Szzuk (talk) 20:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kastles Stadium at The Wharf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fact presented may not be true. The source provided says that construction is yet to start. Can have an article in Wikipedia only after the construction is complete. Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 07:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A quick search of Google will find you plenty of articles about games and events that have already taken place there. For example [1] or [2]. Your rush to delete is uncalled for. In fact, the article needs to be expanded; it is a stub. —Diiscool (talk) 13:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added an appropriate reference and sentence to the article. This is something the AfD nominator could have done rather than opening an AfD, causing a lot more work for a number of people. The reasoning given for this AfD is irresponsible. If an article is out of date, edit it, don't delete it. —Diiscool (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The tone you have used certainly not appropriate for an AfD discussion. I sent this article to AfD for a discussion based on the sources you provided - and that doesn't mean that I am deleting it. As a creator and major contributor it was your responsibility to keep it up-to-date and provide sources which doesn't create confusions. That was an unpatrolled new article remained in the queue for about a month. - Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added an appropriate reference and sentence to the article. This is something the AfD nominator could have done rather than opening an AfD, causing a lot more work for a number of people. The reasoning given for this AfD is irresponsible. If an article is out of date, edit it, don't delete it. —Diiscool (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A quick search of Google will find you plenty of articles about games and events that have already taken place there. For example [1] or [2]. Your rush to delete is uncalled for. In fact, the article needs to be expanded; it is a stub. —Diiscool (talk) 13:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note - Admin may remove this AfD, or can decide for a Keep - Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Its only recently been built but it seems ot meet notability to me and plenty of refs are available. --Kumioko (talk) 16:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.