Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasterborous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gallifrey. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kasterborous[edit]

The article is review- like in nature and contains information that is neither encyclopedic nor referenced. It contains no citation to reliable third party sources and reads like a combination of a review and a fansite, neither of which are appropriate for wikipedia. Information given is also disjointed, disorganised and poorly formatted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HJ Mitchell (talk • contribs) 00:31, April 13, 2009

Merge with Gallifrey Sceptre ^(talk) 01:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gallifrey. All the information in the entry is trivial and merging the lead sentence makes no sense when it doesn't fit the tone of the target article and misses sources. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and/or redirect to Gallifrey. Speculation shouldn't be merged, and the Doctor Who media where this constellation is mentioned serve no more than a ref in the Gallifrey article. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.