Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashubian Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus to delete. Default to keepPeaceNT 15:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kashubian Wikipedia[edit]
- Kashubian Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
procedural nomination Nominated for WP:PROD-deletion, but had previously been considered at AFD as part of a mass nomination (see 2007-02-22 AFD). PROD nominator states: "A good faith effort to find sources has failed to find significant or sufficient reliable sources to comply with notability and/or verifiability requirements." User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CitiCat ♫ 00:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WEB. Being a Wikipedia edition is not an inherent claim to notability. The Kashubian edition seems to have few, if any, reliable, independent sources discussing it. After deletion, consider redirecting to Wikipedia to avoid creating redlinks. --Metropolitan90 05:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I would consider this meta data for an encyclopedia (like discussion pages are for articles). If it really not notable maybe you can put a paragraph explaining that in the article, so we can delete this encyclopedia. It does have over a thousand articles which make it larger than other encyclopedias. --MarsRover 02:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure I understand. I don't want the Kashubian Wikipedia to go out of existence. I just want us to delete the article about it from the English Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 17:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Mars rover. CRGreathouse (t | c) 17:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Over a thousand entries. It's worthy. Axl 21:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Wikipedia. 132.205.44.5 21:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.