Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasam Durga Ki (2019 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kasam Durga Ki (2019 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. All of the refs fail SIGCOV, e.g., ref 1 lists the cast, quotes Rani, and describes the actress's appearance in the poster, which are routine and falls under directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories. Likewise, ref 2 is a routine announcement column going over minor details on the cast and plot, ref 3 opens to the same article as ref 2, ref 4 is a one paragraph non-SIGCOV announcement, ref 5 is an announcement from a non-RS website that publishes on Wordpress per here, whereas the rest are databases on songs. My search found trivial mentions, 1, 2, but I didn't find SIGCOV-meeting sources. All current sources fall under ...announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined per GNG, NFILM criteria are also failed. VickKiang (talk) 02:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 02:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Bihar. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - source found here. @VickKiang: Are you saying that all of Alijala1975's articles need better sources? It is hard to find reviews for Bhojpuri films. Also, the user has created all articles relating to Rajendra Bharadwaj (the writer of this film in the infobox) and still looks fishy (like a COI). DareshMohan (talk) 07:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DareshMohan: IMO it is a routine announcement covering about a song, but doesn't really non-trivially analyse the film, but rather about Rani, e.g., Rani Chatterjee has not only won the hearts of the audience with her strong performance, but her transformation look has also surprised the audience. So I don't think it's WP:SIGCOV, but thanks for the find.

Secondly, many of User:Alijala1975's articles are... probably non-notable IMO. Nevertheless, the film-related articles aren't blatantly promotional for a WP:COI, perhaps the editor is just a fan. But I noticed that the user created the article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajendra Bharadwaj, it's now deleted and I'm going off-topic but do you recall whether that was promotional? Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 07:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@VickKiang: Don't know about Rajendra Bharadwaj but from what it seems online, is that he is not famous enough to have fans (at least views-wise). From what I remember is that the article may not have been promotional (not sure though) but do remember though that it was filled with database sources. Also, the (2019 film) part of the title can be removed. The user has created all of the articles (almost) relating to the YouTube channel of Rajendra Bharadwaj (scroll down and find this film). When a new YouTube promo/trailer/song relating to a movie is released, the user creates an article for it, that is why there is suspicion.

Also remember that the source is in Bhojpuri and the translator you used probably was in Hindi (since it doesn't have Bhojpuri) so it might be inaccurate since you are translating using another language. - DareshMohan (talk) 07:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per the reasons mentioned above. DareshMohan (talk) 07:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.