Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karlie Simon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Karlie Simon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD: "Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No nontrivial biographical content. As described at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmel Moore (2nd nomination), the UKAFTA fails PORNBIO requirements."

I further add that the article should be deleted per WP:PROMO and WP:DIRECTORY; the article does not provide meaningful biographical content and only exists to promote Ms Simon's business. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP as an article about a living person without any references to reliable sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable. This is Paul (talk) 15:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails pornbio & gng. –Davey2010^Talk 22:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO - the lack of content and dearth of intellectually independent sources indicates this article is meant to be platform for promotion. Also, fails GNG, and does not come near to meeting the stringent BLP requirements. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom's analysis and per the argument of my original PROD. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 03:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I guess everything is said. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.