Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Marczuk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Karina Marczuk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. It's an orphan article, 2. It's a resume, 3. She is not notable to have her article in Polish Wikipedia, 4. She wrote it herself, 5. She lacks notability for this Wikipedia Ptok Bentoniczny PS: If you google her, you get a lot of articles in Polish but some of them are about other Karinas Marczuks - e.g. a gynecologist Karina Marczuk...(talk) 19:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ptok Bentoniczny (talk) 19:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not really notable. I did notify Yeann (the article writer) about this discussion. –BuickCentury Driver 20:38, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 21:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She served in a national-level position in the Polish government. ~~Additionally, she has a peer-reviewed publication in a Polish journal; Google Translate suggests that it's a journal about international relations/security studies.~~ Lord Roem (talk) 19:37, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I offer no opinion about any other claims of notability, but must point out that having had a paper published in a peer-reviewed journal is nowhere near passing WP:PROF, or any other notability guideline. That requires having many papers published with many hundreds of citations to them. Pretty well anyone with a PhD has had a paper published in a peer-reviewed journal. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, you're right. Nevertheless, I still believe she meets WP:POLITICIAN because of her high posting in the Polish government. Lord Roem (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I fail to see how she meets WP:POLITICIAN. If I read this correctly, she was a deputy director within a department of the National Security Bureau (Poland). So what I get is that she was a civil servant. -- Whpq (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:POLITICIAN based on the current sources. I can't read polish so there may be other sources out there, if such references are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If my readings are right, and per WP:POLITICIAN, she hasn't held a "national or sub-national" office. — ΛΧΣ21™ 21:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.