Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Ignatyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Armenia in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2019. Daniel (talk) 01:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karina Ignatyan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SINGER. Should be redirected to Armenia in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2019, but this has been contested multiple times. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 01:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 01:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Armenia. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 01:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect seems reasonable, I don't find any sources beyond photos. Oaktree b (talk) 01:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, which has been attempted several times, and then salt to prevent recreation.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:40, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Armenia in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2019 Bruxton (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand Karina Ignatyan also hosted the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2022, so representing Armenia at JESC 2019 is not the only notable thing she's done. I am aware that hosting a JESC may not be a valid criteria, but there are random articles of singers/acts that have only participated in JESC and have done nothing else, yet have no risk of deletion. Made by HKLionel but cannot log in at the moment.\
Redirect per nom. The above WP:OSE argument is unpersuasive in the absence of significant coverage of the subject in RS. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.