Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karin Schubert

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 08:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Karin Schubert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She does not seem to satisfy the criteria under WP:PORNO or WP:ENT. No sources on this article or in the movies' respective articles seem to support having starred multiple notable movies. Leefeniaures audiendi audiat 03:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The page in Cannes literally just mentions that she had a supporting role in one movie that appeared there, so it doesn't count, plus this book seems to be independent self-published work. Leefeniaures audiendi audiat 06:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Cannes page is some kind of archive for a major release that she co-starred in, in 1971 (click on "casting"). Here is the publisher's catalogue of the book mentioned above. They do not look like self-published books. For one, Self published books typically do not have such good cover design. These are professionally released books.96.127.242.226 (talk) 06:42, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And here is the streetview of Editions Intervale in Paris (pan to the right in Google). It's the real deal, which means the book on her published by them is a significant in-depth source.96.127.242.226 (talk) 06:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I performed a web search and was able to add sources to confirm all of the movies the article claims she was in. I added 21 sources to the article. Some are simple name checks, but many discuss her roles. With the book mentioned above and the two recent news articles, I think notability is met. The coverage was in French, Italian and English.96.127.242.226 (talk) 07:11, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After the IP's contributions, I no longer feel it's wise to advocate for deletion. Instead, keep. Leefeniaures audiendi audiat 08:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.