Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kari DePhillips

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kari DePhillips

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ANYBIO the amazing thing is that this page actually explains how she has used marketing techniques to generate backlinks to her company by replying to Help a Reporter Out requests and the article creator is using these sources to try and show notability. the articles written by Suzanna Weiss can be discounted because she and DePhillips actively interview each other [1]. The others can all be discounted as part of her experiment to generate backlinks. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:47, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:20, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:BASIC. Most of the article references aren't independent of the subject since they include short excerpts of statements she submitted through Help a Reporter Out, as she admits through the Entrepreneur article. Newslinger (talk) 00:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above Fails WP:BASIC .Subject is a American entrepreneur and has been interviewed .But it fails WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.