Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Mc Dermott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Mc Dermott

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published author who doesn't appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR or have significant independent coverage. Beware Forbes articles featuring her which appear to be paid-for or self-contributed rather than proper Forbes editorial articles. Boneymau (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom, the page fails WP:AUTHOR, and at best is TOOSOON, but from my searching the subject does not appear anywhere near notable, rather just an average author. Cabrils (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not have significant news coverage. MartinWilder (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NAUTHOR. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly non-notable author, no significant coverage from RS.Brayan ocaner (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Self-published and fails WP:NAUTHOR. ExRat (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.