Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Bartleson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Bartleson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG Sabih omar 07:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: we could claim some notability since she was the IEEE president from 2017 to 2018. The IEEE official website shows that she has some publications, which is confirmed here at Google Scholar. Thus I think she satisfies WP:NACADEMIC by

The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.

... and this article could add a lot of reliable sources by the academic papers she authored or co-authored. Cheers, --TheLonelyPather (talk) 07:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Engineering, and United States of America. — Karnataka ^talk 07:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per TheLonelyPather, I believe that the IEEE presidency meets WP:NACADEMIC #4. I'm happy to reconsider my !vote if this is an incorrect interpretation. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A person doesn't usually inherit notability from working for a notable organization, but IEEEE President is good enough considering the rest. Suitskvarts (talk) 04:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.