Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kareem Nour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 20:55, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kareem Nour[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An attempt at A7 was declined because of the article's fanciful claims regarding its subject. A quick peek into Google does not confirm notability, as per WP:BIO. The fact it is also a vanity article doesn't help. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 18:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 19:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 19:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it stands. Only ref is his site. Notability doesn't cascade from being an 'official photographer' to people of note. And we only have his word for any of these claims anyway. Peridon (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources, and promotional. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons given above. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This puff-piece lacks any independent sources that might establish notability. bobrayner (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.