Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kareem Mitchum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 21:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kareem Mitchum[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - He played for the national team and is a top division player in his country. That's as high as you can go for being a player in a native league. Additionally, I was able to find other sources within seconds.KatoKungLee (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of those points are relevant to WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. Having reviewed all of the sources added, none of them show significant prose coverage. In fact, most are database sources, which are specifically excluded from conferring notability by SPORTBASIC. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

St. Kitts and Nevis has 2 newspapers, a small population and limited internet reach. I don't know what kind of coverage is to be expected of someone in that situation. There's not much more he can do that be a top division player and play for the national team. He's in 8 databases or so and has been mentioned multiple times. ESPN or whatever has never covered a player from St. Kitts and none of us are local to get a magazine or something. None of these teams have websites either and social media websites are not allowed for sources. KatoKungLee (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my source analysis below Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://www.national-football-teams.com/player/27697/Kareem_Mitchum.html	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
https://fbref.com/en/players/61b60427/Kareem-Mitchum	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
https://www.soccerstand.com/player/mitchum-kareem/vJlr60UQ/	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
https://us.soccerway.com/players/kareem-mitchum/158217//	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
https://www.flashscore.es/jugador/mitchum-kareem/vJlr60UQ/	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
https://www.besoccer.com/player/k-mitchum-358108	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
https://www.voetbalkrant.com/saint-kitts-en-nevis/mitchum-kareem/wedstrijden	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
https://fr.soccerstats247.com/joueurs/kareem-mitchum-158217/	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
https://www.sknvibes.com/news/newsdetails.cfm/34753	Mentioned once	✘ No
https://spiceislander.com/the-spice-boys-look-to-go-one-better-in-2010-and-win-the-digicel-cup/	Squad list mention	✘ No
https://spiceislander.com/honours-a-piece-in-digicel-cup-thriller/	Squad list mention	✘ No
http://www.theplayersagent.com/profile/133784/kareem_mitchum	Database source, WP:SPORTBASIC specifically excludes these.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.