Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karadak front

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 10:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karadak front[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A duplicate article of the article 2001 insurgency in Macedonia and other 2001 Macedonian insurgency battle articles, with some POV fork tendencies too. On top of that, none of the sources refer to a "Karadak front", so this article has no purpose being on Wikipedia. StephenMacky1 (talk) 10:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and North Macedonia. StephenMacky1 (talk) 10:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it's a front to take control of the Lipkovo-Kumanovo region and in a front there are series of battles I don't know why you think it shouldn't be on Wikipedia Jesssiemen (talk) 11:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete excessive information, most of which is already included in multiple different articles, but mainly in 2001 insurgency in Macedonia. Jingiby (talk) 11:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Like every war the 2001 insurgency in Macedonia had fronts (Karadak and Pollog), and this particular one was to take control of the Kumanovo-Lipkovo region. If this page should get deleted because most of the battles in the front already have pages, why don't we delete fronts like the Western and Eastern fronts from both World Wars? Because most to all the battles already have pages of their own. Based.shqiptar.frompirok (talk) 15:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong with having a front article, but the difference between those fronts and this so-called front is that the former are widely covered by reliable sources. I have not seen any reliable sources that use the very term "Karadak front". If it was notable, it'd have something unique, rather than simply repeat information from other articles. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is a translation of my Albanian article "Fronti i Karadakut." It is a compilation of a series of battles that happened in the region, which I created due to the lack of information on the Albanian Wikipedia. I don't see a reason to have an English version of it, since the majority of the battles already have their own Wikipages. GermanManFromFrankfurt (talk) 01:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As nom pointed out, I haven't seen this term used in RS. --Local hero ^talk 02:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Google does not show any hits for this term outside of Wikipedia. The total lack of sources means this term should not be an article title. PhilKnight (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.