Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapusta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE Babajobu 10:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Part foreign-language dic-def, part neologism, and part linkspam for podcruft. Delete with extreme prejudice. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 05:08, Jan. 23, 2006
- Delete per nom TheRingess 05:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - Nortonew 05:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 05:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Dbtfz 05:36, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-23 07:41Z
- Delete as part dicdef, part neologism, part podcast. JIP | Talk 10:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Latinus 21:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is also Czech name for cabbage but AFAIK WP does not try to be dictionary of foreign words. Pavel Vozenilek 03:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. incog 01:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. --Timecop 01:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as spam -- Femmina 01:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - garbage Cptchipjew 04:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Eusebeus 11:35, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.