Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapil Chopra
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 00:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Kapil Chopra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lots of breathless praise, but no sources. Does not meet WP:ACADEMIC or WP:BIO, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, Reliable sources and references have been added. Please review your opinionYUVRAJ CHOPRA (talk) 06:41, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry, but my opinion has not changed. Most of your "references" are just names of institutions. The others (to The Tribune, for example) are only in-passing mentions and don't add anything to notability either. --Randykitty (talk) 10:45, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I spot a COI violation as well. Delete. Osarius - Want a chat? 11:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I am unable to find singificant coverage in reliable sources. A search for "Kapil Chopra" turns up many individuals. The most prominent appears to be a bunsinessman heading up the Oberoi group. There are results for somebody by that name involved in the arts (e.g. [1]), but the description of him does not match that of the subject of the Wikipedia article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - US exile clearly a wiki promotional page, probably thrown up to bolster a CV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.170.95.210 (talk) 07:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.