Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanazawa Gakuin University

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kanazawa Gakuin University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources WP:RS RayScript (talk) 16:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The corresponding article in Japanese Wikipedia has more information. Unfortunately that information is given without sources but we can presume that it should be possible to find some sources (quite unlikely the information is made-up) . —- Taku (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Disappointing to see a directory listing-style stub with just an official site created by an experienced editor, but there's no valid reason for deletion given. RayScript be advised that WP:RS is not itself a valid reason for deletion. When it comes to subjects other than biographies of living people, notability is based on the existence of sufficient sources to satisfy the criteria, not whether they're currently in the article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Accredited degree-awarding tertiary institution. No good reason for deletion given. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.