Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kan Lal Agarwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kan Lal Agarwal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the source cited is a reliable source. All great claims made are not supported by any reliable source citation. Not sure how to support the claims and help to keep this article in WP, hence afd nom Educationtemple (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to fail WP:N, WP:PROF and WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:14, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The KAIST award in his name [1] isn't really evidence of notability (it's just a bequest from his will) and the bio there does not give me any stronger evidence of passing WP:PROF. Also the article is horribly written so even if he were notable WP:TNT may be in order. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.