Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kampung Jahang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Since I am the only !voter in nine days, my decision to close it soon after clearly requires explanation. I intended to leave it open; but the nominator's other six AfDs on similar places have all fallen, and, specifically, have all fallen on the same account. That is, the nominator's clear misunderstanding of WP:GEOLAND (even though the first time he was told of it at AfD was in September). Equally lacking is any kind of WP:BEFORE. All things considered, I think there is enough questionable judgement demonstrated w.r.t. these particular nominations that WP:IAR should apply. Better we take the time to educate the nominator in WP:BEFORE than occupy the community's time unecessarilly in multiple discussions on the same issues. (non-admin closure) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 14:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Kampung Jahang

Kampung Jahang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No source and notability. angys (Talk Talk) 08:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 09:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

• Keep passes WP:GEOLAND as a "legally recognised place", for which i have now added a source to the article. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 14:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.