Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Ryuki: Episode Final

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 03:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kamen Rider Ryuki: Episode Final[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTE, lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Page seems to be mostly just a collection of original research violation, no real significant secondary source discussion or critical commentary of any kind whatsoever. -- Cirt (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC) -- Cirt (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —-- Cirt (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —-- Cirt (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —-- Cirt (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It was a film that was shown in Japanese theaters in 2002. It received plenty of press then, but we don't have access to any of it now.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to Closing Admin: Just merely saying "stuff existed", or "it was a film", completely ignores WP:NOTE. Lots of things are films. Porno films are films. But not all of them are notable - that requires demonstration of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. -- Cirt (talk) 21:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - It was notable. It had a bloody theatrical release.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Sorry, but unfortunately, everything that has a "bloody theatrical release", is not automatically notable. -- Cirt (talk) 21:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NF has a section about additional criteria that might show a film's notability aside from what is outlined at WP:N, but I don't see how this film satisfies any of those criteria either. -- Atama頭 22:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the article is not notable as this movie doe's not have significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Powergate92Talk 22:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment Not being able to myself read Japanese, I'll wait until a Japanese-reading Wikipedia interested in digging through and translating sources speaks up... or better, a Japanese Wikipedian who has access to hardcopy sources in Japan libraries and archive... as reliable sources might well be found among the results above, or among sources not available online. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now but renominate at a later time (like the end of this month) if it's become clear that the subject is not notable enough. Nominating an aricle for deletion so early isn't something I would do unless he subject's lack of notabiliy is immidiately obvious. NotARealWord (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a theatrical release by a notable company (Toei Company) and part of a notable franchise (Kamen Rider Series). jgp T C 21:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.