Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider G4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Kamen Rider Agito. Spartaz Humbug! 16:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kamen Rider G4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Purely in-universe reiteration of plot material for a character who appeared in one movie. No material warranting a split at this stage. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:BIO. Elluminate (talk) 16:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is part of the series' plot in a variety of ways. Fractyl (talk) 18:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable source for notability (WP:N), no evidence that it deserves a separate article from Kamen Rider Agito. I'd mention WP:FICT, but since it's an essay I'll just stick to the general notability guidelines.--Boffob (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge back into Kamen Rider Agito. This was made as part of a split and I don't understand why it was necessary to make a page for G4.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 19:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 19:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge back into Kamen Rider Agito per all versions of WP:FICT, and, well, common sense for what to do with inappropriate splits. Does not seem to have independent notability. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.