Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kameelion (musician)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kameelion (musician)[edit]
- Kameelion (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable . Fails Notability guidelines. Previously deleted at AFD and no new notability established. Refs are blogosphere, dead-links or self promotion Velella Velella Talk 12:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This one is really stretching. Lists "spotted on YouTube" as news about the artist. North8000 (talk) 13:34, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Signed to a major label and has singles released. (talk) 19:84, 28 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.217.15.201 (talk) [reply]
- Delete Only go by what he has done and not what he might do. So, he hasn't done a thing to be notable as of yet. Even if he releases a couple of singles, that still doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO. Bgwhite (talk) 18:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete isn't even famous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.13.61.113 (talk) 20:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.