Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Closing all three of these nominations per the discussion at ANI, noting that the nominator has also been blocked for a week for conduct adjacent to these AfD's. This close explicitly does not preclude a discussion at a suitable venue (ie. article talk pages) about content forking/merging/etc. Daniel (talk) 14:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This another recent fork of Kamala Harris Should be deleted and merged back into the main page. Bohbye (talk) 05:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bohbye (talk) 05:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This was a proper WP:SIZESPLIT of an article that is 3500 words, suggesting to merge it back into the main article that is sitting at 6200 words after the split makes no sense. Raladic (talk) 05:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, United States of America, and California. Raladic (talk) 05:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. This is not a content fork, it is a subarticle with a WP:SUMMARY in the main article, as the result of a recent split. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 07:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - a reasonable split from her main article, if all three of these articles nominated for deletion were merged back into her main BLP, that would put the readable prose size at 13,000+ words which is too long to read and navigate comfortably. And my crystal ball predicts her main article will only get longer now with her candidacy for president. It's inevitable. It's a good thing these splits are being done early, instead of dragging our feet. Isaidnoway (talk) 09:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per all of the above; this is a valid split to avoid bloating the main article. Left guide (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Law. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: Quite aside from the comments given above, the nom has failed to proffer any rationale whatsoever for deletion/merger, let alone a valid one. Looks WP:POINTy to me. Ravenswing 12:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: Other like articles exist . Given the office she is running for, it's appropriate to list her achievements of Calif Atty General. — Maile (talk) 12:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Per above. Also, see this related ANI thread. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 12:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Bad-faith nomination from a now-blocked user. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and close ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.