Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalevala (project)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  Sandstein  20:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kalevala (project) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

prod declined. A few references have been added since then. allmusic.com might be reliable, but the own website, discogs.com and the other don't seem to be reliable. Walokia (talk) 02:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete, on the basis that it seems to be a niche project of largely unknown prog rock bands, if we go on the brief mention in Background Magazine. There isn't even an article about it on the Finnish Wikipedia. However, I could be open to persuasion otherwise - Finnish is a quite impenetrable language for non-Finns, so there may be non-English coverage out there. Apart from the two 'reviews' already cited in the article, I can only find band websites and one-person fan websites that mention the album/project. Fails WP:NMUSIC. Sionk (talk) 19:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: unless someone can come up with good sources in Finnish, perhaps a merge and redirect to Kalevala#Music would be the best option? Richard3120 (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  09:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.