Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KakaoStyle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with WP:NPASR. SoWhy 10:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KakaoStyle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no reasonable claim of Notability. The only reference has been removed by the host. The supposed official website does not relate to this product: it belongs to a bank with a similar name. Google News does not find any mentions of it. To be fair, I do not speak Korean so there may be more notability in Korean-language searches which did not show up in my English-language search. Gronk Oz (talk) 12:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Fixed the problems that were mentioned. Missed that when I was creating the page but nevertheless, as mentioned before there is not that much information in English or any articles about the app to add more content. The information on this page comes from the Korean page and since there is a Korean page for this and the app is widely used in Korea, I don't think that the page should be deleted. Yes, I know there isn't much information but still. I encourage growing the page rather then just getting rid of it for minor reasons that won't exist in the future. AquilaXIII (talk) 02:25, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:26, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.