Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaitlin Dason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kaitlin Dason[edit]

Unsourced, non-notable fictional character bio; was mentioned in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Austin which closed wo/prejudice to opening more controlled AFD's.

"Kaitlyn's background has not been revealed. All that is know is that she started a relationship with Lucas Holden and supported him when his brother Jack was murdered."

The suspense is killing me; delete. Cheers, Jack Merridew 12:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 13:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 13:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 13:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to an appropriate character list. Edward321 (talk) 13:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet notability guidelines. No verifiable material.--VS ^talk 14:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a fictional character which is not notable independent of the actors or show itself. I'm okay with the name being redirected to the show article or an appropriate list but I think the article should be deleted. Googling "Kaitlin Dawson" and "Home and Away" gets only 63 distinct (of 434 total) ghits, most (all?) of which are to forums and fan pages. [1] I don't think Google is solely an indicator of notability but for an award winning and popular TV show that is currently airing, I would expect to see much more if this were a notable character. Due to the lack of reliable sources about this character, the article is also unverified and unverifiable and not maintainable. Sarah 02:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, no verifiable material (checked two subscription search engines). Orderinchaos 03:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my nomination statement at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Austin, and User:A Nobody, our article rescuer even admitting not being able to find anything to establish notability. Matthewedwards : Chat 05:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the content of this article is entirely false. It's a hoax article. Matthewedwards : Chat 07:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on the grounds that not a word of it is true. Skteosk (talk) 07:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.