Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaiser Permanente Medical Center (Hayward, California)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kaiser Permanente. MBisanz ^talk 21:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center (Hayward, California)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was a declined PROD. obviously not much here. I am the article creator, and want to simply be sure this article name, if not kept, is preserved as a redirect, as a reasonable search term. i merged the content in anticipation, as many merges dont get done for a while, and the merged content to Kaiser Permanente is so small (i didnt merge the Michele le info, as it would be trivia in the main article). Note other articles on hospitals at Category:Kaiser Permanente hospitals, though some of these are older, larger, etc.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A major medical center for 55 years. Reliable sources can surely be found. Scheduled closure of the facility does not affect its notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MUSTBESOURCES. LibStar (talk) 14:27, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for same reasons mentioned on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaiser Permanente Medical Center (San Leandro, California) Fnordware (talk) 20:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 10:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete age Of centre is irrelevant. No indepth coverage means fails WP:ORG. Keep voter did not supply one source. LibStar (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since all the information has already been merged to the Kaiser Permanente page.Listmeister (talk) 14:15, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.