Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaisar Altaf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Proposed redirect target doesn't exist. Geschichte (talk) 08:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kaisar Altaf

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No coverage found. Störm (talk) 01:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Derbyshire Cricket Board cricketers, which would need to be created. Instead of this whole mass nominating of these types of articles, it would be bold, proactive and more productive to create these outstanding lists and redirect obvious one appearance (with no coverage) cricketers to these? StickyWicket (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; fails all notability guidelines. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 14:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:NCRIC. Ten days ago, I reminded this editor about the closing comments of a past RfC "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". This is one of approx. a dozen back-to-back nominations made today within a 30 minute window, suggesting no attempt at WP:BEFORE was used pre-nomination. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect- Fails WP:GNG, to which NCRIC defers. This article, and so many like it, is just a match scorecard unconvincingly disguised as a biography. Reyk _YO! 13:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete SNG's can be used to presume notability during the article creation process, I will not dispute this, but that notability can be rebutted if it does not pass the basic notability criteria found in WP:N and WP:GNG. After conducting a WP:BEFORE search, the subject does not receive the required coverage as prescribed. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 20:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete totally fails GNG which is the minimum standard for all articles. Any article that fails to meet GNG should be deleted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Would have a place on a specialist Fandom site, but not here. RobinCarmody (talk) 00:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.