Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaili Say

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kaili Say

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a child actress lacking significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability in general or that specifically for actors. She has had three roles in her career according to IMDB. The Desparate Housewives role was a single episode appearance after which the role was recast. The sole source in the article is dead, but can be found at The Wayback Machine which shows it is a local TV station doing a local girl makes it type of story. Whpq (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if IMDB was a reliable source (which it isn't), there still wouldn't be enough to pass WP:GNG -War wizard90 (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even though IMDb is a reliable source for credits, she doesn't have any significant ones, and thus fails WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-too soon. Now someday perhaps. Wgolf (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable at this time. BMK (talk) 22:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - Way too soon, No objections to it being recreated providing there's adequate notability. –Davey2010^Talk 23:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.