Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaif Raza Khan Qadri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kaif Raza Khan Qadri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is non-notable, which isn't surprising for a cleric who's only 19 years old. The sources available are, like those already cited in the article, social media profiles and comments which aren't admissible for establishing notability. The fact that so many links to the subject's profiles are included in this article reeks of an attempt to exploit Wikipedia to generate media buzz for an otherwise unknown individual. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think this one has nothing to do with Pakistan. List this AfD in the Indian list. --Saqib (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

deleteYep looks the same as the other one.Slatersteven (talk) 10:04, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete non-notable. Notability isn't inherited, there is only one sentence about the subject, others are about his great-grandfather and uncle. samee ^talk 14:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per all above. Speedy if appropriate. Smmurphy^(Talk) 16:54, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable. Fails WP:ANYBIO --Hagennos^Talk 14:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete when an article is sourced to an Instagram photo of a hand-written pedigree chart, all I can say is that we are dealing with non-substantiated information.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.