Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kafu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Kafu

Kafu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This person is not notable enough to have their own article ; the article does not explain who this person is and there is not enough information and/or sources about the person. TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 04:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Agreed.--TrUcO9311 ^{<b style="color:darkblue">TaLk} / _SiGn 20:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

• DeleteTotal lack of references mean that I'm not even sure if the subject even exists. Well I know he exists now!! Seriously though, the references we could use off the web seem to refer to his developmental contract signing. Is this grounds for inclusion? I'm not convinced he meets WP:BIO. Keep, it's a hell of a lot better now. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 20:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Though article could use expansion, he appears to be notable enough in his own genre of entertainment. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

*Delete - per nom iMatthew 16:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - So much better with the recent changes. iMatthew 20:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - asserts notability. D.M.N. (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - Information and references significantly improved since nomination (see diff at [1]). There is sufficient information available to make this article notable. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:HEY, article has been significantly improved. Notability is now asserted by significant coverage in third-party sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. It's improved and he appears to establish notability within the wrestling world. --EndlessDan 21:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.