Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaesang Pangarep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that there is enough coverage of him, as a Youtuber and as the son of the President of Indonesia. The specific content objected-to by Jytdog has been removed. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:42, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kaesang Pangarep[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

obvious spam. On top of the promotional pressure for the subject, this has also been subjected to the bizarre "Taslimson Foundation" spamming (see ANI) -- see this removal of my speedy nomination and restoring of Taslimson spam.) And bragging about high school grades in the lead? really? TOOSOON at best - promo junk currently. Jytdog (talk) 02:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 02:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 02:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: president's son, notable Youtuber, subject of a controversy that made it to national news, not to mention the buttload of national coverage. Some pruning of unencyclopedic language is in order, but there is plenty of useful and properly sourced content left in there and WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. --HyperGaruda (talk) 12:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

None of those are reasons to keep, in Wikipedia. The "controversy" is a WP:BLP1E social-media-circus that doesn't have long term significance. This is just gossipy trash. Jytdog (talk) 04:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: What does the "Taslimson Foundation" spam even has to do with the article? Sources are fine and person easily passes GNG Juxlos (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please respond to each other's arguments instead of merely asserting your belief.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 21:27, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 14:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: the subject itself is notable, as he is a well-known celebrity in Indonesia. Content has been significantly improved by other editors, and it's far from being a "gossipy trash". I would say that it's at least as notable as Marian Shields Robinson Mimihitam (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.