Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K M Reedy Reserve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

K M Reedy Reserve[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

irrelevant local sports ground. Fails WP:GNG. In use by a association football club at the sixth level of the Australian football pyramid. Clear case of COI (see name author) The Banner talk 19:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no inherent notability in local sports grounds. LibStar (talk) 06:41, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 15:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 16:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GEOFEAT quite conclusively, non-notable football ground. Fenix down (talk) 12:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm withholding my !vote pending outcome of the AfD on the club itself. If that is kept, this should be redirected there as a plausible search term. If not, it should be deleted. Smartyllama (talk) 15:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - regardless of whether the club is notable or not, this clearly fails WP:GNG Spiderone 11:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.