Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KV Madhusudhanan, former IG, CRPF
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- KV Madhusudhanan, former IG, CRPF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no reference for this person. Seems to be an incomplete page with very little information. Adamgerber80 (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete There are no citations. A Google search didn't produce any decent sources. Imalawyer (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An unsourced WP:BLP on a police official whose highest rank does not appear inherently notable ("An I.G. holds the second highest rank in hierarchy, just below the Director General of Police (DGP) or Additional DGP, and just above Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG)." link). I am seeing no coverage beyond him making a speech at a passing-out parade of new recruits ([1]), which is also insufficient for encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 08:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.