Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KVFA-LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KVFA-LP[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 23:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Arizona. Let'srun (talk) 23:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dave Hettesheimer's monthly Arizona TV Station Update blog posts indicate that this station never operated. No, really.. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: We now require actual significant coverage to establish the notability required for an article… and there are many actually-operated stations that fall short of that and are finally being removed from Wikipedia; there appears to be little-to-no evidence that KVFA-LP even got that far. Back in 2006, the in-practice "notability standard" in this topic area basically amounted to "it's licensed so it's notable!", but this nominally five-year station that may have never actually signed on demonstrates that was nothing more than the broadcast station equivalent to creating articles on places based solely on GNIS (and there have been many AfDs in that topic area lately as well). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This TV station clearly lacks any notability whatsoever, especially since it never operated in the first place.TH1980 (talk) 02:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sammi Brie knows about this category of articles. Lightburst (talk) 04:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. So SIGCOV. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.