Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KRGS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KRGS[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Definitely fails AUD, cannot even find one GNG-qualifying source. Mach61 (talk) 06:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Mach61 (talk) 06:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trying to pull this out of the morass. The Rifle newspaper, which I cannot find digitized anywhere, would be an immense help. But there was significant press in the 1970s when the station almost lost its license. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Sammi (who did an amazing job updating). - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Agreed, that's great work in adding references. Mlaffs (talk) 22:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the types of stubs that were still being created in this topic area in 2009 — and which at the time of nomination this article still was — simply wouldn't fly today, in this era where GNG is what matters (and even when the NMEDIA essay was still being asserted as having any relevance at all, it's easy to forget that even its overpresumption of notability still required reliable sources). While not perfect, at least in spirit the expanded article is much closer to what we're looking for these days. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per WP:HEY given the improvements made by Sammi Brie. Flip Format (talk) 11:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Subject appears to pass the GNG per the added sources. Let'srun (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per what others have already noted. The station has enough sources now. TBH, I'm not even sure why it was nominated for deletion. To me, it sets a dangerous precedent to willy-nilly nominate radio station articles for deletion. There are far more pressing matters on Wikipedia than a radio station from Rifle, Colorado. Milonica (talk) 11:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.