Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KRES

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (Liberatore, 2006) 13:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KRES[edit]

Article created by a banned vandal. Not enough context to save coherently. Brad101 19:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article in it's present state is nearly incoherent; it seems to be nothing more than a timeline of namechanges of a radio station. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 19:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Speedy Delete patent nonsense, article created by banned user. Notability questionable. Morgan Wick 23:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This article gave me a headache. Keep, great job at cleanup. DrunkenSmurf 00:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (non notable) Devious Viper 08:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. RedRollerskate 13:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Bill (who is cool!) 18:42, 15 June 2006
Tried to wikify and salvage. Needs help. Wordy McWordWord 05:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There is a KWIX/KRES Radio Tower. --Zoz (t) 20:14, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's a legitimately licensed radio station; the established precedent is that if a radio station is duly licensed by its appropriate regulatory body (the FCC, in this case), then it's kept. There are no special standards for distinguishing "notable" radio stations from "non-notable" ones other than that. And while the article as it stands right now is certainly stubbish, there's nothing remotely problematic about it. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio Stations. Keep; there's no legitimate deletion case to be made here. Bearcat 02:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 121a0012 04:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw Nomination Article has been cleaned up nicely; thank you. --Brad101 04:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.